My Life, My Thoughts and My Adventures

Many people ask this question, who makes best mobile processor. Which Soc is best. Which Chipset for mobile is best. Simple and straight forward answer is, all are good. All makes good Soc, and in the end everything boils downs to money, your preference and usages. In real world situations you will not see much difference. Intel used to dominate both Mobile Computing market and Desktop Market. In past Intel used to manufacture Arm Instruction set based, Xscale processor, which were considered great and even best in past. But to propagate x86 in mobile sphere, Intel Sold Xscale and tried to replace it with Intel Atom. Intel's came late into party as Intel was never concerned about mobile platform and when it came it failed, Atom never took off. So essentially, Intel is out of mobile market. As its mobile chips do not offer features that Arm based Chips Offer. 99.99 Mobile Soc are based On Arm Architecture. That Includes Apple's Soc. ARM license its micro archite...

Both companies produce great processors and invested a lot in Processor development. That's the reality. Intel and AMD both make a variety of processors for different needs. It all boil downs to your need and your budget of course. Technologically and Historically, Amd's processor was based on Intel's X86 instruction set and when Amd Released x64, Intel adopted that instruction set and started to develop processors based on that Instruction set as x86_64 processors. In the age of Single Core Processors, Amd was King and produced better processor but Scene changed, the day when Intel released it's Core Processor series, Intel reigned for years as Amd lagged and was not able to produce anything Competitive. In Every sphere Intel defeated Amd, Amd Selling point was low price. Well I am not a Fan boy and I prefer the one which gives me best bang for my buck. So I am neutral towards company and even Critical when it comes to Price and Performance Ratio Since 200...